HKDSE Biology Practice & Notes
Topic-based practice with answer frameworks and revision notes
JRE 聯合招聘考試題庫｜中英分流新版
Pickmyquiz
•0.0(0)
820 題 10/4/2026
題庫簡介
JRE 2.1.19+ 中英文 topic 分流、日常雙語練習及模擬試卷專用；506 題全量優化版本。
Preview questions
20 questions available free你是財經事務及庫務局的政策主任。「共用現金提取點」是由多間大型銀行共同出資及營運、供參與銀行客戶提款的固定設施。有意見建議，要求大型銀行在沒有分行服務的地區設置這類設施，並把每日24小時開放列為建議服務規格；須先確認場地開放、保安、補鈔及故障後備安排，不能把24小時開放等同每刻保證成功提款。 (a) 分析上述建議的利弊。 (b) 表明你是否支持上述建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出推行安排；如反對，提出最少兩項維持現金服務可達性的其他措施。
你是醫務衞生局醫療融資策略小組的政策主任。醫療儲蓄戶口是2008年醫療改革第一階段諮詢所列的補充融資選項之一，自願醫保計劃則自2019年4月1日起全面推行。有意見建議立法設立強制醫療儲蓄戶口，由在職人士按薪金供款存入個人戶口，專用於日後醫療開支。 (a) 分析該建議的利弊。 (b) 表明你支持抑或反對該建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出落實方法；如反對，提出最少兩項達致相同政策目的的其他措施。
情境 你是環境及生態局的政策主任。部分既有出租商業樓宇的業主負責改善中央裝備，但電費主要經管理費由租戶支付。有意見建議設立配對資助，支援超出適用法定標準的節能改善：政府支付合資格新增成本的三成，每幢上限50萬元；申請人須扣除其他資助，並承諾完工後首三年，把至少一半經核實的淨營運節省透過帳單回扣租戶，不得另以相關工程附加費抵銷。 作答要求 (a) 分析上述資助及租戶受益條件的利弊。 (b) 表明你是否支持這項建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出落實安排；如反對，提出最少兩項促進這類出租樓宇節能改善的其他措施。
你是創新科技及工業局的政策主任。有意見建議，所有供市民使用的電子政府系統每次完成獨立網絡安全審計後，須逐項公開審計發現、風險級別、修補期限及覆測結果；可被利用的技術細節可暫緩，其他欄位如合併後直接增加攻擊風險，亦可附具理由暫緩或改以匯總發布，其餘資訊須公開。 (a) 分析該建議的利弊。 (b) 表明你支持抑或反對該建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出落實方案；如反對，提出最少兩項同樣能加強電子政府系統的網絡安全及公眾問責的其他措施。
你是運輸及物流局的政策主任。實時交通燈號調節系統（RTATSS）利用感應器偵測實時車輛及行人流量，再按交通情況調整綠燈時間。有意見建議，把該系統加速推展至經運輸署工程及系統適用性評估確認可安裝的所有獨立及聯動路口。 (a) 分析該建議的利弊。 (b) 表明你支持抑或反對該建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出落實方法；如反對，提出最少兩項達致同一政策目的的其他措施。
情境 你是房屋局的政策主任。有意見建議向首次置業青年提供低息、較長還款期的政府首期貸款。申請人須符合入息、資產及物業價格限額；貸款不得超過已核實的首期差額，並另設每人上限。審批須把銀行按揭及政府貸款供款合計，確認申請人有還款能力。 作答要求 請參考附件，分析這項方案的利弊，表明你支持抑或反對，並提出理據。如支持，提出落實安排；如反對，提出至少兩項協助青年負擔置業開支的其他措施。
你是創新科技及工業局的政策主任。現行「粵港澳大灣區青年創業資助計劃」透過受資助的香港非政府機構，向香港青年提供創業支援及培育服務，並以配對資助形式提供起動資金；計劃對受資助團隊的研發地點沒有要求，業務可設於香港及／或大灣區內地城市，因此研發設於香港、並在大灣區內地城市開展業務的香港青年初創企業，本來已可申請。有意見建議，在日後新一輪撥款中新增「研發須設於香港」的資格條件，即受資助團隊須在香港保留實質研發活動。 (a) 討論該建議的利與弊。 (b) 就政府應否採納該建議提出立場及理據。 (c) 如支持，建議如何落實；如反對，提出最少兩項能達致相同政策目的的其他措施。
You are a policy officer in the Civil Service Bureau preparing a discussion paper on promotion assessment. Multi-source appraisal collects ratings and specific examples of work behaviour, under common criteria, from a candidate's line manager, peers, subordinates and work partners where applicable. The proposed use is one formal source of promotion evidence, with promotion boards retaining judgement and no link to pay or retirement contributions. For this hypothetical assignment, the bureau must decide whether to prepare a one-cycle pilot before committing to wider adoption. Using Data Files A–D, write the discussion paper. It should: (a) diagnose what the existing material establishes about promotion assessment and what it leaves untested; (b) compare strengthening supervisor-led assessment with piloting multi-source evidence, including fairness across posts, evidence reliability and processing capacity; and (c) recommend an approach, set out the work and resources needed before a decision to launch, and propose an evaluation that distinguishes influence on rankings from better selection. Address the strongest objection to your recommendation. No trial results or staffing budget are supplied. Identify information to obtain and explain how it would affect the decision; do not invent it.
You are a policy officer in the Labour and Welfare Bureau preparing a joint discussion paper with the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau on emergency income support. The objective is to prevent recently unemployed people from falling into arrears or abandoning job search during a downturn. One option is a time-limited loan whose principal remains repayable and whose default risk is shared between government and lenders. For this hypothetical assignment, senior officials have asked for a scheme design before deciding on activation or funding. Using Data Files A–D, prepare the paper: (a) identify the liquidity and repayment problems that the schemes must address, and assess what the past loan and grant records can and cannot establish; (b) compare a partial-guarantee loan, a full-guarantee loan and non-repayable relief, including access, debt hardship, abuse controls and recovery-adjusted fiscal cost; and (c) recommend a design, explain how applicants would be directed to appropriate support, and set out funding, delivery, hardship and monitoring arrangements that must be settled before activation. Address the strongest case for a different design. No current take-up forecast, screening standard or net-loss estimate is provided; state what further information is needed without inventing figures.
You are a policy officer supporting Department of Justice-led interdepartmental work on gender recognition. A proposed statutory system would allow an eligible person to obtain a recognised gender status for the public records and procedures expressly covered by legislation, without requiring full sex-reassignment surgery. For this hypothetical assignment, prepare an interdepartmental options paper using Data Files A–D. Distinguish the existing HKID sex-entry policy from the legal effects the proposal would add; compare statutory recognition with coordinated administrative record handling; and recommend the work needed on eligibility, covered legal contexts, privacy, review and transition. Discuss medical exceptions and the consequences for married applicants, addressing the strongest objection to your approach. The current HKID criteria are a baseline to assess, not a prescribed answer for every legal purpose. Explain which choices require medical evidence or legal examination, and how the departments should resolve them before implementation. No applicant numbers, dispute rates or processing-resource estimates are supplied.
Scenario You are a policy officer supporting the Rating and Valuation Department's tenancy services. A district team has received a group of requests concerning electricity charges in regulated subdivided-unit tenancies. It has a one-off HK$120,000 allocation for additional support over the next eight weeks. Two quotations have been obtained: a neighbourhood document clinic and an evidence-preparation assistant. Neither has been commissioned. Task Write an internal recommendation to the head of tenancy services. Diagnose the different problems in the case file and identify the further evidence needed. Compare the two quotations, recommend how the allocation should be used and explain the consequences for households who will receive less additional assistance. Set out a workable eight-week service and investigation plan, including the response to the landlord's refund offer, the use of existing staff, costs and measures of results. You may recommend another arrangement if you explain its work, resources and feasibility.
You are a Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau policy officer preparing an options paper for discussion with HKEX and the SFC on broadening Hong Kong's cross-boundary fundraising base while preserving market quality. One proposed Belt and Road listing chapter would retain the same listing and continuing-compliance standards, but offer geographic priority pre-vetting and a first-year fee concession unavailable to other overseas issuers. For this hypothetical assignment, use Data Files A–E to assess the barriers the proposed chapter would actually address. Compare the chapter with needs-based pre-filing support and stronger cross-border regulatory cooperation. Recommend a practical package, explaining its additional value over existing services, review-capacity and funding requirements, treatment of equally qualified applicants, and evidence needed to evaluate results. Address the strongest case for the option you do not recommend. Neither issuer classification nor review staffing, comparative listing costs or use of current channels is supplied. Identify how those gaps affect your decision and how you would obtain a credible baseline; do not infer demand from aggregate market recovery.
You are a Labour and Welfare Bureau policy officer preparing a service-and-funding paper with the Social Welfare Department, which delivers community care vouchers. A proposed dedicated long-term-care reserve would release funding to a district in tranches when unmatched Central Waiting List cases rise and recognised providers can deliver additional services. For this hypothetical assignment, use Data Files A–E to recommend how extra community support should be made available earlier. Diagnose whether the missing link is funding responsiveness, provider capacity or both; compare the dedicated reserve with a pre-authorised ordinary-budget release mechanism and targeted capacity support; and design the demand-and-capacity trigger, expenditure horizon and delivery responsibilities. Explain what must be verified before committing funds, how recurring costs and scrutiny would be handled, and how you would judge whether older people receive suitable services sooner. Address the strongest case for the reserve as well as its limitations. No district-level unmatched-case series, provider spare-capacity estimate or reserve funding horizon is supplied. Distinguish a published annual quota from evidence about the scope or speed of in-year adjustments.
You are a policy officer in the Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau preparing a discussion paper for an interdepartmental working group. The group is considering machines that record an elector's choices and print a voter-verifiable paper ballot, while voting remains in person at polling stations. Members disagree about whether this would reduce casting errors and improve independent access, and whether the paper audit could remain secret and reliable. Using Data Files A to E, prepare the paper to: (a) identify the operational problems and evidence gaps, distinguishing vote casting, voter check-in and vote counting; (b) compare a machine pilot with improving the existing paper-ballot checking and assistance arrangements; and (c) recommend a feasible course of action, with responsibilities, resource priorities, safeguards, evaluation and the conditions for any statutory use or expansion.
You are a Department of Justice policy officer preparing a programme-design submission on structured secondments for practising Hong Kong lawyers in legal institutions in Belt and Road jurisdictions. Participants would remain employed in Hong Kong and undertake supervised legal work at a host for a defined period, rather than a study visit or course. For this hypothetical assignment, use Data Files A–D to recommend whether and how a pilot should be prepared. Explain the practical-capacity gap that the existing routes leave untested; set out criteria for approving host duties and matching practitioners; and compare sustained placements with strengthening existing training and international-organisation routes. Your submission should identify legal and operational checks, costs borne by the host, government and home employer, small-firm access, and how usable knowledge would return to the profession. Address the strongest objection and propose evidence for deciding which placements merit continuation. No host offers, foreign practising-law advice, visa timetable or outcome figures are supplied. Do not assume observation is lawful legal practice, that existing routes teach nothing about national procedures, or that participant counts demonstrate competence gains.
You are a Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau policy officer preparing a briefing for discussion with the SFC and HKMA on a proposed professional-investor DeFi pilot. A licensed operator would conduct limited live protocol tests while remaining accountable for the activities it is authorised to perform. Its licence does not by itself establish that every proposed DeFi activity is permitted. For this hypothetical assignment, use Data Files A–E to recommend a readiness decision: proceed to live testing subject to verified requirements, narrow the design, or retain simulation/research pending further work. Diagnose what risk evidence the existing reports leave unanswered and compare the learning value and limitations of these options. Set out the operator's realistic control boundary, investor and spillover protections, responsibility for losses, technical and supervisory resources, and the evidence needed before live funds are committed. Propose an incident-measurement and response plan, explaining what pausing admission can and cannot accomplish. No protocol audit, licence-scope opinion, interested-operator count, capital figure or loss forecast is supplied. Address the strongest objection to your recommendation without assuming that a sandbox label waives law, that professional status removes technical risk, or that an operator can freeze external protocols.
以資料所列2025年5月至8月的歷史情境作答。你是環境及生態局政策主任。有意見建議政府啟動管制即棄膠杯、杯蓋、食物容器及容器蓋供應的第二階段法定條文。 (a) 分析這項建議的利弊。 (b) 表明你是否支持該建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出落實安排；如反對，提出最少兩項同樣能夠減少即棄塑膠餐具使用，同時維持食肆和外賣服務的可行運作的其他措施。
You are a Labour and Welfare Bureau policy officer preparing an employment-support service brief for HK Talent Engage. A proposal would provide TTPS holders who have arrived and remained unemployed for three consecutive months with one year of case-managed qualification checks, genuine vacancy matching and interview coordination. Employers would keep recruitment decisions and no job would be reserved. Participation would not substitute for Immigration's extension-of-stay criteria. For this hypothetical assignment, use Data Files A–E to assess whether targeted casework would add value to existing support. Diagnose the evidence gaps behind employment difficulty and non-application for extension; compare intensified casework with improving existing self-service and occupation-specific tools; and recommend a pilot or preparatory approach. Specify referral and verification arrangements, staff and funding commitments, fairness to other jobseekers, and an evaluation capable of separating sustained employment gains from selection effects. Do not treat non-application as measured talent loss, compare percentages with different denominators as a single attrition chain, or assume a service can guarantee a job or visa extension. Identify what information would change the recommendation.
你是發展局政策主任。有意見建議政府把片區開發定為北部都會區內商業收入足以承擔公共設施、而土地用途可綜合交付的新發展片區的主要發展模式。 政府以整個片區招標，由同一中標者按合約綜合交付可發展土地、基建及公共設施。 (a) 分析這項建議的利弊。 (b) 表明你是否支持該建議，並提出理據。 (c) 如支持，提出落實安排；如反對，提出最少兩項同樣能夠加快北部都會區土地、基建、房屋及產業設施的綜合交付的其他措施。
Scenario You are a Culture, Sports and Tourism Bureau officer assessing public support for a fictional international arts event proposed for September 2027. The organiser has delivered comparable events elsewhere but this would be its first Hong Kong edition. A suitable venue has been provisionally held for six performances, with total ticket capacity of 30,000. The finance team asks whether to negotiate a grant of up to HK$3 million under applicable funding arrangements, explore a new capped ticket-revenue guarantee, or provide neither. An indicative HK$4 million maximum event-support exposure is available for consideration, not an approval to issue a guarantee or spend money. Task Write a funding recommendation comparing the proposed structures and the option of declining support. Explain who bears demand and delivery risk, whether the event's public value justifies intervention, and what must be settled before any commitment. Address cash flow, verification, cancellation, full public and private costs and evaluation. The event, offers, costs, demand and funding envelope are fictional; existing fund rules are separately described below. Do not assume that a guarantee is already an available fund product.
使用者評價
0.0•0 則評價
尚無評價
成為第一個評價這個題庫的使用者
